CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON REDDIT UPGRADE
CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON REDDIT FULL
CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON REDDIT PRO

I was initially surprised to see that these chips produced the scores they did in Geekbench 5, with the M2 Pro slightly ahead of the M2 Max. The other big difference is the GPU: The M2 Pro has a 19-core GPU, while the M2 Max has a 38-core GPU. The two CPUs both have 12 cores, but the M2 Pro has 32GB of RAM and the M2 Max has 64GB. The performance scores those sites have published are fascinating.

MacBook Pro 14-inch, M1 Pro, (8-core CPU, 14-core GPU, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD) MacBook Pro 16-inch, M1 Max (10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) MacBook Pro 14-inch M2 Max (12-core CPU, 38-core GPU, 64GB RAM, 2TB of SSD) MacBook Pro 14-inch, M2 Pro (12-core CPU, 19-core GPU, 32GB RAM, 2TB SSD) We've collated some scores from our sister sites Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide, as well as some of our prior review data on the 2021 models.

CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON REDDIT UPGRADE

It starts with a 12-core CPU and 30-core GPU, and the upgrade nets you a 38-core GPU. The M2 Max is only in the laptops: the 14 and 16-inch MacBook Pros. Some reviewers saw the M2 Pro in the laptop, while others saw it in the Mac Mini. The 16-core neural engine is the same across both chips.

CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON REDDIT FULL

The base model has a 10-core CPU and 16-core GPU, but most of the reviews out there have a step up: the full 12-core CPU and 19-core GPU. The M2 Pro can be found in all three of Apple's new computers: the Mac Mini, 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros. The general consensus seems to be that the new chips bring some solid performance upgrades, especially for those looking to upgrade from older Intel-based systems. That's not to say the new system's designs aren't important - I own an M1 Pro MacBook Pro and like it very much, minus the notch - but we're focusing on what's been changed and improved. We're particularly interested in two things: performance and battery life. While we still hope to get our hands on the new processors to run them through their paces, we're pouring over the existing results to see what reviewers think of the new chips. The design of the machines are effectively the same (minus some port changes on the Mac Mini), so the big changes are all in the silicon. FP performance definitely matters, but it's hardly all that matters, and I'd be highly surprised if the integer side isn't the critical path most of the time.The first reviews of Apple's refreshed MacBook Pro and Mac Mini are here, and, with them, we're getting to see impressions of Apple's new M2 Pro and M2 Max processors. And the more you zoom out of those 'math-heavy' leaf functions, the lesser the FP mix. The parts that don't run on the GPU are more concerned with managing discrete states, calculating branch conditions, managing GPU memory resources, allocating and initializing objects, just managing general data structures, and so on and so forth.Īgain, I'm not denying that there are parts of games that are more FP-heavy, but looking at my own decompiled code, even in things like collision checking and whatnot, even in the FP-heavy leaf functions, the FP instructions are intermingled with a comparable amount of integer instructions just for, you know, load/store of FP data, address generation, array indexing, looping, &c.

Dolda2000 - Saturday, Aplink While games certainly do use floating-point to an extent where it matters, as a (small-time) gamedev myself, I'd certainly argue that games are primarily integer-dominated.

Cpu benchmark comparison reddit